The ratio is half the answer
A 3:1 setup is not "better" than a 1:1 setup in any absolute sense — it is a different bet with a different hit rate attached. What matters is whether your actual win rate clears the bar the ratio sets, and that bar is exactly 1 ÷ (1 + ratio).
- 1 : 1 — needs to win 50% of the time
- 2 : 1 — needs 33.3%
- 3 : 1 — needs 25%
- 0.5 : 1 — needs 66.7%
This is why scalping a half-R target is harder than it looks: two thirds of those trades have to work, forever, before fees. And it is why a trader who wins a quarter of the time can still be profitable at 3:1 — provided the targets actually get hit rather than being decorative.
Where the number lies to you
The ratio assumes both outcomes are equally reachable, and they are not. A target three times further away than your stop is not three times as likely to be reached — it is meaningfully less likely, because price has more time and more chances to hit the near level first. Treat a high ratio as a hurdle you have made harder to clear, not as free money.